June 22, 2024

Alina Habba Rips Hush Money Trial Process After Daniels Testimony

Advertisement


OPINION: This article might include commentary which displays the writer’s opinion.


Former President Donald Trump’s chief spokeswoman, Alina Habba, criticized the direct examination of grownup movie star Stormy Daniels relating to her alleged sexual encounter with Trump following extremely sexualized testimony final week.

In an interview with Fox News, Habba identified that Daniels supplied hours of testimony revealing extremely delicate particulars in regards to the alleged encounter, which most information retailers didn’t cowl as a consequence of their “salacious” nature. Judge Juan Merchan upheld a number of protection objections however denied Todd Blanche’s request for a mistrial on behalf of Trump.

During an look on “America’s Newsroom,” Habba, who can be an lawyer, criticized the road of questioning and the choose’s refusal to permit the trial to proceed.

“Okay, so I know you can’t talk about Stormy Daniels’ testimony, but maybe you could comment on this. Judge Merchan talked about the defense, complaining about the testimony. He said, ‘I agree it would have been better if some of these things had been left unsaid,’ but they were already said in front of the jury.”

“Yeah, this is the problem here. And the judge did try and put guardrails with the prosecution and say that these are the guardrails,” Habba started.

Advertisement

“Let’s just go back to basics here. This is about books and records keeping. This is about somebody in Trump Tower who registered a legal fee as a legal fee payment. Okay. That’s it. A payment to Michael Cohen, who was an attorney. To reimburse him– was a legal fee. That’s what this case is about. Where was President Trump? In the White House,” she added. “And they’re attempting to now make this a really salacious, you realize–. It’s a, it’s an entire extortion scenario.

“And they’re using their hand for the Biden administration to, number one, slow him down so that he can’t go on the campaign trail. Number two, get headlines that they think will damage him. And it’s just very clear. And the judge was trying to prevent that. But I can tell you, I just thought the prosecution completely disregarded the guardrails, didn’t care. And that’s why we moved for a mistrial yesterday,” she added.

WATCH:

Meanwhile, this week, authorized specialists following the case stated that Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s prosecutors have failed to indicate what “other crime” is required to boost misdemeanor costs to 34 felonies.

On Thursday, Michael Cohen, the previous president’s lawyer and fixer, was again on the witness stand for his second cross-examination by the protection crew.

Former federal prosecutor Katie Cherkasky advised the Washington Examiner that prosecutors face the problem of building the misdemeanor of falsifying enterprise information earlier than proving the felony “escalator,” or the allegation that the paperwork have been falsified with the intent to hide or help within the fee of one other offense.

By the time the prosecution wrapped up questioning Cohen on Tuesday morning, they gave the impression to be closely counting on Cohen’s resolution to cease being loyal to Trump after coming into a responsible plea to federal costs in 2018. However, they’d not explicitly said what additional crime Trump hoped to facilitate by allegedly falsifying information associated to Daniels’ hush cash funds.

Prosecutors declare that Trump could also be responsible of a number of potential offenses, together with breaking the Federal Election Campaign Act, which the FEC had already decided he had not carried out. Also, federal prosecutors within the Southern District of New York didn’t discover any crimes beneath which Trump may have been charged once they examined the case greater than 5 years in the past.

Cherkasky said that she and a number of other different attorneys “don’t think that you can incorporate a federal offense that isn’t within the jurisdiction of the New York court as the escalating offense” and that if the jury discovered Trump responsible, doing so would current a extra vital problem for an appeals courtroom.

Additionally, prosecutors should take care of the truth that the Federal Election Commission ended its investigation into whether or not Trump broke election legislation by paying Daniels in May 2021 in the event that they plan to depend on Cohen’s responsible plea in 2018 to the marketing campaign finance violation.

Furthermore, after investigating the cost, the Biden Justice Department determined to not prosecute Trump for any crimes related to it.

Advertisement

Test your expertise with this Quiz!



Source