March 4, 2024

If Joe Biden Can’t Win in 2024, Maybe AI Can Win for Him

Microsoft has a plan to make use of AI to create a “healthy information ecosystem” simply in time for the 2024 election.

A February 5 headline from Microsoft’s personal web site sends the sign: “Here’s how we’re working with journalists to create the newsrooms of the future with AI.” That’s the supposed future: The marriage of Big Tech and Big Journalism, with a hybrid offspring coming quickly to a display close to you. 

Highlighting new “partnerships” with varied publications and non-profits, Microsoft tells us, “We are helping these organizations identify and refine the procedures and policies to use AI responsibly in newsgathering and business practices,” including that the objective is to “identify ways AI can help create efficient business practices and help build sustainable newsrooms for generations to come.”

Microsoft founder Bill Gates (Jordan Vonderhaar/Bloomberg through Getty Images)

Here’s the interpretation from the company blather-speak: Microsoft, the richest company in the world, is making its transfer into journalism, or, extra exactly, the journalism enterprise. Journalism, for higher or worse, requires journalists, these flesh-and-blood price facilities, whereas the journalism enterprise can get by on no matter it may well get away with, AI-wise.

Yet, thus far, no less than, AI journalism has not been successful. Most clearly, reporters understand that AI might ship them down the identical automated chute as bobbin turners and hod carriers. So they’ve been calling out AI when it’s gotten too flagrant, as in the latest case of Sports Illustrated. That was a victory for journos, though, after all, quickly thereafter, the publication shut down. 

The logos of Microsoft and ChatGPT. (LIONEL BONAVENTURE/AFP through Getty Images)

Without a doubt, the cost-cutters and spread-sheeters will preserve slicing, and on the identical time, AI will preserve bettering, even when it’d all the time have issues in the uncanny valley.

Yet Microsoft prices forward, unspooling a slew of botwords—“responsible,” “sustainable,” “efficient”—that appear half cyborg. Of course, it’s all a cloak for the woke. Such wokeness needs to be no shock, on condition that AI is being constructed in locations similar to Seattle and San Francisco. (This blue-state-origin drawback might be endemic till purple states work out methods to make their very own AI.) 

This announcement from Microsoft is not only concerning the information enterprise in basic. It can be about “democratic elections worldwide.” The Microsoft February 5 announcement makes this explicitly clear:

Today, Microsoft is launching a number of collaborations with information organizations to undertake generative AI. In a yr the place billions of individuals will vote in democratic elections worldwide, journalism is vital to creating wholesome info ecosystems, and it’s our mission, working with the trade, to make sure that newsrooms can innovate to serve this yr and in the long run. [emphasis added]

How handy for President Joe Biden and the Democrats that Microsoft is creating this “healthy information ecosystem” in time for the 2024 election. 

We can see the “reportage” now: The financial system is powerful, the border is okay, crime goes down, electrical autos are an ideal thought, variety is our energy, trans girls are girls, and so forth. Oh, and Joe Biden is tremendous, thanks for asking. 

Will that schtick persuade you, expensive reader? Probably not. But if it fills up teenagers’ TikTok, it’d transfer sufficient votes in Georgia or Arizona. Oh, and by the way in which, Microsoft’s AI, as aimed by Democrats, might additionally guarantee us, swear to Gates, that vote fraud is a fantasy.

(iStock/Getty Images)

So, that might be the long run: The information as a platform, with the platform managed by, “populated” by, AI. At the identical time, we’ll be instructed by our digital overlords that Donald Trump is a menace to society, that Republicans hate girls, and that local weather change is an existential menace. Any reporting on the contrary is, after all, disinformation.

Ah, disinformation! How many crimes are dedicated in thy identify! As Breitbart News readers know, the reviews about Hunter Biden’s laptop computer, or the unwell results of Covid lockdowns, have been true. Yet these and different truths have been suppressed, labeled as “disinformation.” Back then, Big Tech, together with Twitter, was comfortable to affix in the suppression. Anything to assist the peppy and sharp-as-a-tack Joe Biden win the election! 

Yet since Biden took workplace, this new form of political correctness has taken some hits; for occasion, in 2022, the Soviet-sounding “Disinformation Governance Board” was laughed out of existence. Perhaps most consequentially, Elon Musk bought Twitter, renamed it X, and established it as a counter-disinformation machine.

Elon Musk x / Twitter

An effigy of Elon Musk is seen on a cell gadget with the Twitter and X logos in the background in this picture illustration on 23 July 23, 2023. (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto through Getty Images)

Still, the “d” phrase lives, alongside its sibling, misinfo, for one easy motive: The left and the Democrats don’t need dissenting views, and so they have entry to large cash, tapping each Big Government and Big Progressivism.

On January 26, journalist Lee Fang—himself a refugee from the left—reported on the efforts of 1 Brian Murphy, a former FBI agent and onetime head of the intelligence unit on the Department of Homeland Security. Murphy “has proposed that law enforcement and intelligence agencies formalize the process of sharing tips with private sector actors—a ‘hybrid constellation’ including the press, academia, researchers, non-partisan organizations, and social media companies—to dismantle ‘misinformation’ campaigns before they take hold.” So there you’ve it: The complete lefty equipment linked up. 

Moreover, Murphy has been working with—you guessed it—AI to additional suppress badthink. A British AI firm, Logically, additionally “maintains a public-facing editorial team that produces viral content and liaisons with the traditional news media.” Fang provides that Logically “differs from other players in this industry by actively deploying what they call ‘countermeasures’ to dispute or remove problematic content from social media platforms.” Now there’s a phrase: countermeasures. A authorities well-funded sufficient to not solely detect “disinformation” however then additionally well-muscled sufficient to start out punching it out. 

Logically has completed jobs for the federal government of the United Kingdom (the Conservative Party, in energy for the final 14 years, has operated largely like liberal Democrats in the U.S., though that might, in the end, be changing), in addition to the federal government of Canada (everyone knows about its woke chief, Justin Trudeau). Here in the U.S., Logically has gained contracts with the state of Oregon, the town of Chicago, and the U.S. Army’s Special Operations Command (and that’s simply what we find out about). 

So there’s the imaginative and prescient: Big Tech is aware of who’s been good and who’s been naughty and is armed with each carrots and sticks. The hoped-for finish end result: a “clean” media setting, as judged by, say, Hillary Clinton and enforced by, say, the singing censor Nina Jankowicz. The fact and nothing however the fact!

This imaginative and prescient of stories sanitation remembers the 2004 film The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, in which the primary characters go to a tech service to have their minds wiped of disagreeable recollections. So now possibly AI can replace: The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless News.

Will this shiny and seamless imaginative and prescient or information hygiene work? Will this tech-totalitarianism succeed? One factor we’ve discovered: Folks are kinda cussed and truly quite laborious to idiot. Across the world, folks have rejected the slickest and most one-sided propaganda in favor of socialism and communism. Back in 2008, we’d recall, a really aggravated Barack Obama lamented that individuals “cling to guns or religion.” And no less than just a few media retailers won’t Obey–one such being Breitbart News. 

So, there’s good motive to hope that Americans—sufficient of them, no less than—will see by way of this newest “techaganda” push. But don’t assume for a second that it received’t be a combat. 

Source