June 22, 2024

Judge Says Closing Arguments in Trump’s Hush Money Trial Will Be Next Week

Advertisement


OPINION: This article might comprise commentary which displays the creator’s opinion.


The sixth week of former President Donald Trump’s “hush money” trial on allegations of faking firm data started on Monday and is sort of over.

Justice Juan Merchan of the New York Supreme Court delivered a large ruling on Monday, saying that closing arguments will happen subsequent week.

Michael Cohen’s testimony is anticipated to finish on Monday. Using Cohen’s previous of mendacity and breaking the legislation, Trump’s legal professionals tried to undermine Cohen’s credibility final week. Prosecutors declare that different witnesses and monetary paperwork support Cohen’s testimony.

Justice Merchan additionally gave the protection some course on the subjects on which he would allow former Federal Election Commission chairman Bradley A. Smith to testify. To show to the jury that Trump wasn’t making an attempt to sway the 2016 election together with his purported enterprise report violations, the protection desires Smith to go over how federal election legal guidelines function.

Experts are usually not allowed to elucidate or interpret the legislation, in response to Merchan. “However, it seems to this court that it would be impossible for Mr. Smith to testify about” marketing campaign finance legislation “without discussing or invoking federal law in terms of precedent, agency opinions, or the intent of creation behind some of these rules.”

He stated Smith might learn the pertinent laws and laws however not interpret them, failing which prosecutors would possibly name in their marketing campaign finance professional and make the trial a “battle of the experts.”

When requested by protection lawyer Emil Bove if Merchan meant to offer the jury directions on marketing campaign finance and manipulating an election, the decide stated he wouldn’t till he had seen proposals from each side. When Merchan lastly instructed the protection to current him with proof of what Smith would say, Bove complied.

Things haven’t been going nicely for District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Advertisement

Hope Hicks, who served as a counselor to the president for Trump, had an emotional breakdown when testifying in Bragg’s hush cash case final week.

Hicks labored for Trump starting a mere two years after she left school and had an extended skilled relationship with him. She was beforehand known as to testify earlier than the House January 6 Committee, and now the case is about alleged funds made to grownup film actress Stormy Daniels.

Hicks broke down in court docket, prompting Judge Juan Merchan to name for a brief recess. After she testified for the prosecution, the protection legal professional, Emil Bove, cross-examined her, and he or she shortly “broke down,” MSNBC reported.

“I want to talk to you about your time at the Trump Organization,” the legal professional stated to Hicks earlier than she began to get emotional.

“Sorry about that,” she stated after returning to the witness stand.

“No, it’s okay,” the legal professional for the previous president stated.

“Absolutely…I don’t think he wanted anyone in his family to be hurt or embarrassed about anything on the campaign.  He wanted them to be proud of him,” Hicks testified.

Her testimony was an “epic miscalculation that backfired spectacularly” on the prosecution, Fox News authorized analyst Gregg Jarrett said.

“The account by Hicks demolishes District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s primary claim against Trump that he paid porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence with the intent to benefit his campaign and, thereby, influence the election by ‘unlawful means.’  To the contrary, it nicely corroborates the findings of a federal investigation that no crimes were committed, or campaign finance laws broken because there was another purpose for the non-disclosure agreement that Daniels signed,” he stated.

“Like the prosecution witnesses before her, Hicks disparaged Bragg’s planned star witness, Michael Cohen, Trump’s one-time personal lawyer.  ‘He used to like to call himself Mr. Fix-It, but it was only because he first broke it.’ Ouch!  But that denigrating remark is tame compared to the other derisive comments that have been leveled thus far at the insufferable Cohen, who is a convicted liar who went to prison,” he stated.

“Hicks confirmed that Trump was aware that Cohen paid off Daniels to end what can fairly be described as aggressive blackmail demands. When the election drew near, Daniels ratcheted up her greedy scheme to profit from Trump by threatening to go public about a supposed affair, which he denied.  Not incidentally, she renounced the purported tryst. Then, in a head-spinning maneuver, she recanted her repudiation,” the analyst stated.

It was one thing that her former legal professional, Michael Avenatti, stated on X, previously Twitter, from his jail cell.

“Keith Davidson is lying,” he stated on Thursday. “After I confronted her w/ her own text msgs, Daniels admitted to me in early 2019 that she & Davidson had extorted Trump in Oct. 2016 – it was a shakedown.”

“This was one of the many reasons I fired her as a client in Feb. 2019,” he stated.

Davidson was the legal professional for Daniels and former Playboy mannequin Karen McDougal, who secured confidentially agreements and payoffs for each of them.

Jarrett questioned the place the crime was in the case, as confidentiality agreements are usually not towards the legislation.

“The payments made were not illegal.  Non-disclosure contracts in exchange for silence are not unlawful. Killing negative stories violates no statutes.  More to the point, it is not a crime for Trump to know about a non-crime. That would be a senseless syllogism,” the authorized analyst stated.

“So, where exactly is the crime? To quote a memorable line from ‘Shakespeare In Love,’ ‘I don’t know…it’s a mystery!’” he stated.

“There is, however, no mystery behind Alvin Bragg’s politically driven prosecution of Trump.  Out of thin air, the DA conjured up expired misdemeanors, dumped them into a Cuisinart, tossed in a garbage state statute that doesn’t apply to a federal election, hit the “puree” button, after which poured out an absurd concoction of fake felonies,” he stated.

Test your expertise with this Quiz!

Source