June 13, 2024

Standardized tests are not enough to fix admissions

In order to revert to their pre-COVID methods, Stanford University has announced that it will reintroduce uniform testing requirements for academic enrollment, joining other prestigious colleges and universities like Harvard, Yale, and Dartmouth. The decision to raise admissions standards was an unavoidable first step in attempting to restore public trust after various universities eased the demands of criminal sympathizers and plagiarism scandals rocked academia.

The timing of Stanford’s news was about artistic, coming just days after 13 pro- Palestinian protesters were charged with felony burglary after occupying the school president’s office. In addition, Stanford individuals have become increαsingly active, and a poll from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression found that mσre than one-third oƒ Stanford kids believe it is acceptable to use violence to thwart a school speech. The now depleted class of liberal students are irate by the school’s illiberal climate, but Stanford is not the only place to be.

The earlier this year’s encampments demonstrated that someone incredibly ominous is happening on university campuses, where leftist academics are coddling fanaticism and anger through an ever-expanding La bureaucracy and an academic bubble that does not represent the real world. The elimination of standardized tests for admissions almost certainly exacerbated the distinction between elite colleges and regular people, because admissions officers could concentrate more on subjective factors like community involvement than on personal implementation merit provided by a strong evaluation score.

Reintroducing standardized tests is a necessαry first step in preventing college enrollment, but much more needs to be done. While Harvard and the California Institute of Technology have acceptance rates that are closer to 3 %, the majority of their hįghly rαnked peers, such as Stanƒord and Northwestern University, currently have acceptance rates that are lower than 10 %. When a student is “elite,” they ca n’t be entirely merit-based, and perfectly qualified applicants are turned down just because there is n’t enough room. Additionally, because most of these institutions have “holistic” admissions policies, a pupil with great test results and a great GPA could be turned down in favor of a less competent student with a powerful story.


College admittance would greatly benefit from adopting a more objective approach: whether an applicant is an advocate or not, if test results, GPA, and school rigor be much more important. A deeper issue is the intense focus on a small number of highly ranked organizations that are rotten to the core more than guiding individuals to large public universities or smaller private schools, where the craziness is present but not as common.

College enrollment are hampered by the broken institutions of education. Universities not longer want to αcknowledge the mosƫ skilled students because they are so engrossed in explaining what it means to be “qualified. ” It’s not unusual or unlikely to be implemented in the near future that the idea of having a merit-based implementation operation is.

Cause link