May 21, 2024

Trump Appeals ‘Unconstitutional’ Gag Order Imposed By Hush Money Judge

Advertisement


OPINION: This article could comprise commentary which displays the writer’s opinion.


Lawyers for former President Donald Trump have filed an enchantment of what he calls an “unconstitutional” gag order positioned on him by Judge Juan Merchan, who’s overseeing the hush cash trial involving grownup movie star Stormy Daniels.

“I just want to let you know that we’ve just filed a major motion in the appellate division concerning the absolutely unconstitutional gag order, where I’m essentially not allowed to talk to you about anything meaningful that’s going on in the case. And many good things are going on with the case. It shouldn’t have been filed,” Trump announced on Thursday.

Trump is topic to a gag order that prohibits him and anybody performing on his behalf from making public statements about witnesses, their potential involvement, or feedback relating to courtroom workers, DA workers, or their members of the family, Fox News noted. Merchan has discovered Trump in violation of this order ten occasions, imposing complete fines of $10,000, and has warned of potential jail time if Trump continues to breach the order.

Trump additionally shared with the media authorized specialists’ unfavourable views on the impeachment trial. Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley had been among the many students who criticized the trial.

“‘This is a Frankenstein case. They took a dead misdemeanor, they attached it to a dead, alleged federal felony and zapped it back into life. So many of us are just amazed to watch this actually walk into court because it’s not a recognizable crime that any of us have seen,” Trump mentioned, quoting Turley, a regulation college professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“‘I’ve been doing this for 60 years, and I don’t understand what crime he’s been charged with. Nobody understands this. I just don’t get the crime. There’s no evidence of any crime whatsoever. This is a sham,’” Trump continued, quoting Dershowitz.

Trump’s chief spokeswoman, Alina Habba, railed against the direct examination of Daniels relating to her alleged sexual encounter with the true property mogul following extremely salacious testimony earlier this week.

Habba, in an interview with Fox News, famous that Daniels gave hours of testimony revealing extremely delicate particulars concerning the alleged encounter that almost all information shops didn’t cowl on account of their extremely “salacious” nature. Judge Juan Merchan upheld a number of protection objections however rejected Todd Blanche’s request for a mistrial on behalf of Trump.

In an look on “America’s Newsroom,” Habba, herself an legal professional, was essential of the questioning.

“I ask you about yesterday’s testimony,” co-anchor Dana Perino started. “Okay, so I know you can’t talk about Stormy Daniels testimony, but maybe you could comment on this. Judge Merchan talked about the defense, complaining about the testimony. He said, ‘I agree it would have been better if some of these things had been left unsaid,’ but they were already said in front of the jury.”

“Yeah, this is the problem here. And the judge did try and put guardrails with the prosecution and say that these are the guardrails,” Habba started.

“Let’s just go back to basics here. This is about books and records keeping. This is about somebody in Trump Tower who registered a legal fee as a legal fee payment. Okay. That’s it. A payment to Michael Cohen, who was an attorney. To reimburse him– was a legal fee. That’s what this case is about. Where was President Trump? In the White House,” she added. “And they’re making an attempt to now make this a really salacious, you realize–. It’s a, it’s an entire extortion state of affairs.

“And they’re using their hand for the Biden administration to, number one, slow him down so that he can’t go on the campaign trail. Number two, get headlines that they think will damage him. And it’s just very clear. And the judge was trying to prevent that. But I can tell you, I just thought the prosecution completely disregarded the guardrails, didn’t care. And that’s why we moved for a mistrial yesterday,” she added.

WATCH:

Advertisement

Test your expertise with this Quiz!



Source