June 22, 2024

Trump Civil Fraud Judge Engoron Under Ethics Investigation


OPINION: This article might include commentary which displays the creator’s opinion.

Arthur Engoron, the choose who oversaw former President Donald Trump’s monumental civil fraud trial, could also be in scorching water himself after talking to an lawyer concerning the case earlier than his ruling with out following established guidelines for the court docket.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct is investigating an alleged interplay between a New York actual property lawyer and the choose who issued a $454 million judgment towards Trump, in line with NBC New York.

The outlet reported that actual property lawyer Adam Leitman Bailey acknowledged having a dialog with Judge Arthur Engoron a couple of weeks earlier than the choose was set to decide. Democratic Attorney General Letitia James of New York filed swimsuit in September 2022, during which she accused Trump of exaggerating the worth of his actual property holdings to safe loans.

“Bailey claimed in a television interview that he approached Engoron to share his perspective on a key legal issue related to the trial. He insisted that he intended to help the judge understand the greater implications of the harsh ruling against Trump, particularly for New York’s economy. However, such conversations are prohibited under New York’s judicial conduct rules unless all parties are notified and given a chance to respond,” the report mentioned.

“I actually had the ability to speak to him three weeks ago,” Bailey mentioned within the Feb. 16 interview, in line with NBC New York. “I saw him in the corner [at the courthouse] and I told my client, ‘I need to go.’ And I walked over and we started talking … I wanted him to know what I think and why…I really want him to get it right.”


The lawyer mentioned that he “explained to him” that the fraud statute getting used within the case wasn’t meant for use to destroy an enormous firm, notably when there are not any victims within the case.

He mentioned he was involved about how the legislation was being utilized within the case and mentioned that the judgment may negatively have an effect on the economic system of New York.

“He had a lot of questions, you know, about certain cases. We went over it,” he mentioned.

“No ex parte conversation concerning this matter occurred between Justice Engoron and Mr. Bailey or any other person. The decision Justice Engoron issued February 16 was his alone, was deeply considered, and was wholly uninfluenced by this individual,” a spokesman for Engoron advised NBC New York.

That mentioned, the New York State Rules of Judicial Conduct says that judges can’t “initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers concerning a pending or impending proceeding,” with few exceptions. An “ex parte communication” is one during which a choose or member of the jury communicates with an outdoor get together with out all concerned events current, NBC New York added.

“The Commission on Judicial Conduct is constrained by a strict confidentiality statute and has no comment on this matter,” Commission Administrator Robert H. Tembeckjian told the Daily Caller.

In March, a New York appeals court docket choose lowered the bond Trump was required to pay to enchantment the ruling. Previously, on September 26, Judge Engoron discovered Trump accountable for fraud and ordered the rescission of a number of of Trump’s enterprise licenses. However, an appeals court docket stayed the ruling on October 6.

In April, stories mentioned that Trump will problem Engoron’s definition of fraud that led to the huge civil fraud judgment.

Chris Kise, Trump’s principal lawyer within the case, advised Newsweek that it “will depend on many factors so it’s hard to say at the moment, but in any event, it will fall within the 30-day clock” that’s allowed by the court docket.

Kise accused New York Attorney General Letitia James and Engoron of making an attempt to drive Trump out of New York, calling it a tragic day for the town.

“The case raises serious legal and constitutional questions regarding ‘fraud’ claims/findings without any actual fraud,” Kise mentioned.


Test your expertise with this Quiz!