May 1, 2024

NPR CEO Katherine Maher Reveals How She Ruined Wikipedia

Katherine Maher, NPR’s newly appointed CEO, is going through criticism over her previous tweets as a veteran editor accuses the group of leftist bias. But alongside the way in which, one other fascinating line of investigation has opened — how Maher wrecked Wikipedia by turning away from “free and open” discussions on the “online wikipedia” as a result of that objective represents a “white male westernized construct.”

The Daily Mail reports that Katherine Maher, NPR’s newly appointed CEO, has sparked controversy after a resurfaced clip from a 2021 panel dialogue hosted by the Atlantic Council revealed her calling the First Amendment the “number one challenge” in American journalism. During the dialogue, Maher, who beforehand served because the CEO of Wikimedia the guardian group of Wikipedia, argued that the First Amendment supplies a “fairly robust protection of rights,” making it “a little tricky to address some of the real challenges of where bad information comes from.”

 

The controversy has additionally delivered to gentle a few of Maher’s previous tweets, which embody a veiled shot at former President Donald Trump, branding him a ‘deranged racist sociopath,’ and her support for President Biden by sharing selfies sporting his marketing campaign hats. Maher has additionally expressed views on gender and language, tweeting, “I do wish Hillary wouldn’t use the language of “boy and girl” – it’s erasing language for non-binary individuals.”

But past her excessive leftist political beliefs, lots of Maher’s statements replicate on her time main the guardian basis of Wikipedia. Her feedback a couple of “free and open” Wikipedia the place a number of sides of an argument could possibly be introduced to customers really being a “white male Westernized construct” are eye opening, and clarify how Wikipedia turned a cesspit of fringe leftist beliefs the place any stability or conservative viewpoints are instantly crushed.

Maher’s perspective and management at Wikipedia goes a good distance in explaining how the location devolved from a web based encyclopedia right into a supply of faux information and excessive leftist groupthink. Over the years, Breitbart News has investigated and reported on many pretend information hoaxes that started life on Wikipedia, together with one about Breitbart News itself:

Framing Breitbart

Breitbart News has additionally been the topic of a Wikipedia hoax by itself web page the place left-wing editor “Snooganssnoogans” added a declare in early 2017 that Breitbart promoted the “Pizzagate” conspiracy principle, which claims John Podesta’s e-mails about pizza are coded references to a toddler intercourse ring linked to the Clintons. The cited supply doesn’t declare this and Breitbart’s solely look within the article is an embedded tweet from its verified account, which talked about certainly one of Podesta’s pizza-related e-mails weeks earlier than the conspiracy theories emerged.

However, editors stored the fabric even after it was challenged. An article within the Independent would later repeat this false accusation together with different detrimental materials copied from Wikipedia’s Breitbart article. One editor suggested citing the article for different claims on the web page. Breitbart News has by no means promoted the Pizzagate conspiracy principle, however justlikemanyothernewsoutlets, it has reported on the connection between the Clintons and the late accused intercourse offender Jeffrey Epstein. Ironically, Breitbart has been banned from Wikipedia for practically two years after editors deemed it “unreliable” in a discussion claiming Breitbart publishes “fake news” on its web site.

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has been a very fierce critic of the location’s lack of stability, which once more may be attributed to Maher’s management:

On May 14, Sanger published a weblog piece titled “Wikipedia Is Badly Biased” and began by declaring Wikipedia’s “Neutral Point of View” coverage useless. Having based the web encyclopedia with Jimmy Wales and having been concerned within the original drafting of the coverage, Sanger provided specific perception into its growth and its observe in recent times. On the present coverage’s rejection of offering “equal validity” to totally different views, Sanger acknowledged this went immediately towards the unique coverage’s intent and that “as journalists turn to opinion and activism, Wikipedia now touts controversial points of view on politics, religion, and science.”

Providing examples, Sanger famous former President Obama’s article excludes most notable scandals throughout his Administration, such because the bungled ATF Fast and Furious operation that armed Mexican cartels who killed a U.S. border agent or the targeting of Tea Party groups by the IRS. By distinction, Sanger pointed to Trump’s article containing overwhelmingly detrimental sections on the President concerning his “public profile” in addition to investigations and impeachment. The sections crucial of Trump and his presidency are practically so long as these coping with his presidency total. He additional criticized Wikipedia repeatedly saying Trump makes false statements somewhat than attributing such characterizations to sources.

Read extra at the Daily Mail here.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News masking problems with free speech and on-line censorship.



Source