CNN Legal Analyst Stunned By Stormy Daniels Admitting She Hates Trump

CNN authorized analyst Elie Honig referred to as it a catastrophe that grownup movie actress and Trump trial witness Stormy Daniels was cross-examined following her testimony in opposition to former President Donald Trump.

Though Honig deemed Daniels’ testimony relating to a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump in a lodge room “plausible,” her solutions throughout Trump’s workforce’s cross-examination referred to as into doubt her reliability.

“So it‘s interesting, because I was doing our live coverage, following along with our minute-by-minute updates from inside the courtroom, and I had the exact opposite impression. Now, you had the benefit of being in the courtroom, so I will defer to that, but we do also have to be careful when we play sort of amateur psychologists to the jurors’ movements, right?” Honig started.

“They were leaning forward, they were taking notes. Okay. They could be taking notes because they think this is a great point, or they could be taking notes because they think ‘This makes no sense and I don‘t believe it.’ So let‘s just all be cautious in reading into the jurors physicality. My impression was she was plausible on her explanation of what happened in that hotel room. It‘s hard for me to believe that a juror heard that and thought this is entirely made up,” he stated.

“There may well be some embellishments, which Arthur I think pointed out effectively in the last hour, but I think it‘s quite clear they had sex in 2006 in that hotel room. But the cross-exam, boy, her responses were disastrous. I mean, do you hate Donald Trump? Yes, of course she does. That‘s a big deal. When the witness hates the person who‘s liberty is at stake, that‘s a big damn deal. And she‘s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail. That really undermines the credibility,” he added.

Advertisement

Honig continued: “The fact that she owes him $500,000, she, by order of a court, owes Donald Trump a half million dollars and said, ‘I will never pay him, I will defy a court order,’ the defense is going to say, ‘She‘s willing to defy a court order. She‘s not willing to respect an order of a judge. Why is she going to respect this oath she took?’ So I thought it went quite poorly on cross-exam. At the end of direct, I thought, ‘Okay, they got what they needed,’ but I think the cross is make real inroads.’”

WATCH:

In a separate section, a authorized analyst for MSNBC broke down grownup movie star Stormy Daniels’ testimony throughout Trump’s hush cash trial on Tuesday whereas speculating what impression it could have had on the jury.

Legal analyst Harry Litman, reporting from the Manhattan courtroom, famous that Daniels might need triggered some confusion among the many jury together with her “wild” testimony.

After the prosecution questioned Daniels in court docket earlier than a lunch break, Litman, a former U.S. legal professional, spoke with MSNBC about his observations. He instructed that Daniels’ testimony, which he described as maybe too “colorful,” might need elicited blended reactions from the jury.

“There was a lot to see as far as the jury. We’re talking about a very, very colorful witness who detailed kinds of events and just efforts and ways of being that I think for the jury were fairly foreign. She spoke very quickly, nervously, she told a lot of jokes, but not all of them landed,” he stated.

During her testimony, Judge Juan Merchan agreed with a number of objections from Trump’s protection workforce, which included overly detailed descriptions of their encounters, such because the clothes Trump wore and mentions of merchandise like Old Spice.

The decide stated at one level that Daniels was offering “unnecessary” particulars throughout her testimony, together with an outline of a sexual place she claimed she and Trump have been in. Litman famous that he had by no means seen Merchan as “irritated” as he was by the extent of element within the testimony. Previously, the decide needed to warn Trump of potential jail time after he was present in felony contempt for the tenth time for violating a gag order.

Litman characterised the testimony as “wild” and “hyper-colorful.” Daniels recounted a second when she humorously requested Trump if Hugh Hefner was conscious that he had taken his pajamas after Trump allegedly greeted her at a lodge suite door wearing “silk or satin” pajamas. According to Daniels, Trump “politely” modified his apparel at her request.

Litman famous that in Daniels’ testimony, the jury’s consideration was primarily centered on her, not the previous president.

Trump, he stated, had a “general impassiveness” because the alleged particulars have been being revealed. “My general feeling is, like, wow, this is a colorful, maybe hyper-colorful witness,” Litman added.

Trump signaled this week that he’s keen to be locked up for violating Merchan’s restrictive gag order in remarks to reporters.

Advertisement