May 19, 2024

The Proliferation of ‘Disinformation’ Media and A.I. Puts More Bricks in the Wall 

Sometimes small issues reveal massive realities: And that’s the case with disinformation, which has been variously outlined as the whole lot from “foreign propaganda” to “conservative beliefs.” We are reminded: They are all the time placing one other brick in The Wall. 

For occasion, this latest merchandise from TV Newser: “Ahead of the 2024 presidential election Scripps News is launching a six-person Disinformation Desk to investigate disinformation and the sources that might cause it to spread.”   

But wait only a second right here! Isn’t the complete media business shrinking? Why sure, it’s–layoffs galore. So, why now could be Scripps abruptly hiring six folks?  

Scripps is a venerable identify in information. Founded again in 1878, the firm grew to be a formidable newspaper chain.  It was the residence, for instance, of the beloved columnist Ernie Pyle, who coated World War II from the entrance strains, reporting to 700 newspapers again residence.  In April 1945, Pyle was killed on Okinawa; the following yr, he was immortalized by Burgess Meredith in the Hollywood film The Story of G.I. Joe.

Scripps-Howard columnist Ernie Pyle shares cigarettes with some First Division Marines as they relaxation at an Okinawa roadside on April 8, 1945. (CORBIS/Corbis by way of Getty Images)

But newspapers have fallen on arduous occasions since. Scripps offered off its fading print holdings in 2014, focusing on TV, which, of course, can also be fading. So, now, six hires to work on disinformation? We would possibly ask: Where’s the cash coming from? 

One supply is foundations. Yes, the media enterprise is shriveling, however the inventory market is booming; the Dow Jones Industrial Average is 4 occasions what it was a quarter-century in the past, and different indexes are up much more.  So even when the media enterprise mannequin is dying, the media philanthropic mannequin can do positive, as long as outdated cash tied up in charity investments is doing effectively and is in serving to media.

So, we come to the Scripps Howard Fund, the place some of that outdated cash, tracing again almost 150 years, nonetheless abides. It will come as no shock that it’s a liberal outfit, emphasizing DEI, bestowing grants on the Diverse, funding liberal green journalism projects.

Yet maybe the hottest subject for progressives lately is combating the dreaded “disinformation,” the enemy of liberal reality. According to a 2022 headline from Disinformation Week, “In American Newsrooms, the Disinformation Beat is On the Rise.” As if on cue, that very same yr, the Scripps Howard Fund gave $3.8 million for “disarming disinformation.”

So, now to that just-announced Scripps News disinformation undertaking headed by Liz Landers. Who is she?  According to her Wikipedia web page, whereas nonetheless in faculty in Massachusetts, she interned for a Democratic state consultant. Then she freelanced some articles for The Daily Beast and labored at CNN and at Vice News—the latter which, like so many portals, just lately went bust. But now she’s again to work, simply in time for the 2024 election.

In different phrases, even when media sources are skimpier than they as soon as had been, the fourth estate is getting reinforcements from foundations.

Oh, and they’re additionally getting assist from Big Tech. Together, foundations and Tech Lords fire up a potent financial cocktail for journalism, together with the newest tech device, synthetic intelligence (AI). 

Here at Breitbart News in January, this writer headlined, “Hey Siri: How Was the Next Generation of Media Bias Built into A.I.?”  The level being that left-leaning journalism was now being absorbed—and enhanced—by left-leaning AI. In February, I added one other piece, headlined, “If Joe Biden Can’t Win in 2024, Maybe AI Can Win for Him.”  

Both journalists and AI are being assisted by a constellation of quasi-journalistic “centers” for combating disinformation, most of them foundation-funded non-profits, typically related to a school or college (free intern labor!)  

But what number of such facilities are there, precisely? Seeking an a solution, I turned to, sure, AI. That taught me one more lesson in how media bias + AI is bricking up that Wall.  

Mindful that Google’s Gemini AI is laughably woke, I assumed I’d strive one other AI program. So, on April 18, I went to Microsoft Copilot, which payments itself as “Your everyday AI companion.” I requested my new pal the following question: “How many disinformation groups are there in the US?” 

Here’s the reply I bought:

The unfold of disinformation on-line has turn out to be a big downside in the U.S. and round the world.  Various teams actively contribute to the dissemination of disinformation.  Here are some examples…

Screengrab of Microsoft Copilot’s reply to the query: “How many disinformation groups are there in the US?”

It then listed two examples of organizations it accuses of “spreading disinformation,” the first of which was the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
Hmmm. You’ll discover that I didn’t ask the AI about teams it thinks foment disinformation; as an alternative, I requested it to numerically quantify the teams that it thinks fight disinformation. But maybe the program was simply desirous to slap poisonous labels on a corporation it dislikes. (Somewhere, a human progressive programmer should really feel proud.) 

As for ALEC, it was based in 1973, describing itself as “America’s largest nonpartisan, voluntary membership organization of state legislators dedicated to the principles of limited government, free markets and federalism.” So, yeah, come to assume of it, it’s straightforward to see why a left-winger, human or digital, would regard ALEC as bother and search to stigmatize it with the “d” phrase.”

The Microsoft reply continued, arguing that ALEC has “been criticized for sowing doubt on climate change and eroding trust in democracy.” At this level, the dutiful progressive could be considering, if ALEC is that dangerous, perhaps one thing have to be achieved. Note to ALEC: check on your IRS status. 

The subsequent “example” of disinformation Copilot cited was “Large Fossil Fuel Companies and Their Lobbying Groups,” particularly, the American Petroleum Institute (API). Quoth Copilot: “They work hard to cast doubt on climate change, which can have detrimental effects on public understanding and trust in democratic processes.” 

We can see the intellectual-rhetorical escalation occurring right here with AI, up from the extra acquainted mainstream media bias. According to our AI pal, questioning  “settled science” not solely undermines liberal crusades, it additionally jeopardizes democracy itself. 

I stored after Copilot as to what number of disinformation teams there are, and finally it began itemizing the teams it favors, beginning with the U.S. State Department’s Global Engagement Center, and persevering with with the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Treasury, in addition to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. You’ll discover that Copilot is dutifully figuring out the federal authorities as the final supply of reality.

But past the federal authorities, Copilot does level to different authorities. For occasion, Copilot informed me, “The Disinfo Defense League, supported by the Media Democracy Fund, comprises over 200 grassroots organizations that combat disinformation, particularly in Black communities.” You can learn extra about the Disinfo Defense League, “a network of intersectional organizations,” here. And as for its benefactor, the Media Democracy Fund, it has given away over $50 million. And it, in flip, is a liege to the New Venture Fund, which experiences, “More than half of the 50 largest US grant-making foundations have funded projects hosted at the New Venture Fund, including eight of the top 10.” 

You get the concept. All that tech and all cash are constructing a wall of progressive orthodoxy about what’s true—and what isn’t. And now, with some of that cash, Scripps News is including a brand new brick.  



Source