House Passes Bill To Codify Definition Of Anti-Semitism

During a time when demonstrations in opposition to the Israel-Hamas battle in Gaza have erupted at faculties throughout the nation and raised issues about Jewish college students’ security, the GOP-led House handed a invoice on Wednesday that will formalize an interpretation of anti-Semitism and function a information for the enforcement of federal anti-discrimination legal guidelines, together with academic packages.

“The proposal, which passed 320-91 with some bipartisan support, would codify the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a federal anti-discrimination law that bars discrimination based on shared ancestry, ethnic characteristics, or national origin. It now goes to the Senate, where its fate is uncertain,” the Associated Press reported.

The invoice, which was launched by Representative Mike Lawler (R-NY), adopts the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of anti-Semitism, which states that it’s “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.”

Antisemitism can take the type of verbal or bodily acts directed at Jewish or non-Jewish folks, their property, Jewish group establishments, or locations of worship, the Daily Wire noted.

House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik wrote on X, previously often called Twitter: “I fully support
@RepMikeLawler’s Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023. This bill codifies President Trump’s Executive Order and is an incredibly important step to ensure that Jewish students and community members at America’s universities feel safe once again on campus and sends a clear message that @HouseGOP will not tolerate antisemitism anywhere.”

I totally support @RepMikeLawler‘s Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023.

This invoice codifies President Trump’s Executive Order and is an extremely necessary step to make sure that Jewish college students and group members at America’s universities really feel secure as soon as once more on campus and sends…

— Rep. Elise Stefanik (@RepStefanik) May 1, 2024

Advertisement

New York Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler was one of many invoice’s opponents. He claimed in his flooring remarks that defining anti-Semitism too narrowly may make it tougher to implement federal civil rights legal guidelines.

He added that “contemporary examples” of anti-Semitism can be found on the IHRA, and that a few of them could contain “protected speech in certain contexts, particularly concerning criticism of the state of Israel.”

Concerning the checklist, a couple of Republicans voiced related issues about free speech.

Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, for instance, questioned whether or not Americans ought to face authorized penalties for violating the IHRA’s checklist of latest examples, mentioning that the invoice’s textual content doesn’t outline anti-Semitism.

He said on X that the invoice was “poorly conceived and unconstitutional.”

🧵 Today the House will vote on a invoice to outline antisemitism with the intent to extend prosecutions of exercise on campuses.

The invoice has an issue past violating the first Amdt:

The definition of antisemitism seems no the place within the invoice!

Why?https://t.co/5A0alnuuOp

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) May 1, 2024

Do you agree with all of those examples of antisemitism? Should folks in America be prosecuted for saying these items in all contexts? I feel not. This is a poorly conceived unconstitutional invoice and I’ll vote no. pic.twitter.com/L3AI5MCFGw

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) May 1, 2024

The Department of Education could be required to make use of the IHRA working definition and present situations of anti-Semitism when implementing federal anti-discrimination legal guidelines, in response to Lawler’s workplace, when the invoice was launched in October, simply after the lethal Hamas assault on Israel.

The workplace additional said that utilizing the IHRA definition “in this context is a key step in calling out antisemitism where it is and ensuring antisemitic hate crimes on college campuses are properly investigated and prosecuted.”

The invoice is presently on its method to the Democratic-controlled Senate, the place there has already been a bipartisan effort to undertake the IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism.

President Joe Biden will determine the destiny of the invoice if it passes the higher chamber.

On Tuesday, the House Republicans introduced an initiative to sort out anti-Semitism in increased schooling.

The plan requires a number of committees to intently look at federal funding and tax advantages acquired by universities, along with taking powerful measures in opposition to overseas college students who use their visas to support terrorist organizations whereas attending American universities.

Advertisement