Legal Expert Throws Cold Water On DA Bragg’s ‘Hush Money’ Case Against Trump

As the test is scheduled to start on Monday, a prominent legal analyst has raised new questions about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s ‘hush cash ’ case against former president Donald Trump.

Because this situation involves politically charged matters, elections will predominate in this one. If I’m Trump’s attorney, I’d love to have rules protection on the jury. I’d like to hear from people who have had negative constitutional experiences. In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity on Friday ahead of Monday’s test, which may start with jurors choice, they will be looking for those, according to Fox News analyst Gregg Jarrett.

The knowledge of British voters is something that Biden Democrats and the media undervalues, according to me. They perceive these obscene legitimate maneuvers as exactly what they are: a vicious effort to sabotage an election through a breach of our system of justice. And I think it ’s faltering. A growing number of people see Trump as a victim, not a villain, and it ’s fortified his support, ” Jarrett continued.

Trump will become the first ex-president of the United States to encounter a legal case on Monday, making history. Following an investigation into allegations that he fabricated business records, his prosecution by the company of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg came in March 2023. The allegations relate to payment made to solitude adult film star Stormy Daniels, who claimed to have dated Trump in 2006, a state he has refuted. The payments were made during his 2016 presidential plan, Newsweek reported.

Advertisement

Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over the situation, sent a letter to the prosecution and the defense on April 8th, in which he listed 42 questions that could be posed to prospective jurors before the jury selection process. Jarrett made his remarks after the letter.

These questions aimed to evaluate the jury ’ media consumption routines and their membership in pro—or anti-Trump demonstrations. Concerns about potential jurors ‘ voting history or any political campaign contributions may not be a part of the selection process.

Robert Swafford, a judge expert based in Texas, has noted that the prospective jury could have a significant impact on Trump’s prosecution.

He claimed that a jury verdict in the case would need to be majority, so a second judge who is a fervent supporter of Trump could stop it.

“If one real disciple, a MAGA admirer, manages to get on the judge, therefore it won’t matter how much data the trial brings to bear. That jury will wait until the nation declares not guilty. And that juror will derail the case because a verdict in a criminal trial must be decided unanimous, ” he said, adding that both the prosecution and the defense will carefully examine potential jurors for bias, though it might be difficult to tell.

“I’m sure that both legal team are doing research on the prospective jury ’ social media accounts, their voting files, any prior criminal convictions, and record histories—everything that can be searched in a database, ” Swafford said.

But ultimately, those website trails would become very difficult to find if someone deleted their social media accounts or action on forums. If someone simply denies they have certain prejudices, that is even more difficult to prove, ” Swafford added.

The judge will face a major issue as a result of the jury selection, according to Neama Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers and former federal prosecutor.

Because anyone knows and feels something for Trump, choosing a winner may be challenging. Judge [ Juan ] Merchan may have to go through hundreds of potential jurors to find 12 who can be fair and impartial, ” he previously told Newsweek.

Advertisement