May 20, 2024

‘This Is a Tragedy!’ Fox & Friends Rips Boy Scouts For Name Change

Advertisement


OPINION: This article might comprise commentary which displays the writer’s opinion.


The Boy Scouts of America has introduced that they are going to be altering their identify to Scouting America, 5 years after they started admitting women into the group.

However, two boys on Fox News are mourning the “tragedy” of this choice. Ainsley Earhardt, co-host of Fox & Friends, invited Fox hosts Will Cain and Pete Hegseth to react to the information. Both hosts expressed disappointment within the 114-year-old establishment for altering its insurance policies to develop into extra inclusive.

“Well, the Boy Scouts has been cratering itself for quite some time. You see this, this is an institution the left didn’t control. They didn’t want to improve it. They wanted to destroy it or dilute it into something that stood for nothing. So five years ago, the Boy Scouts let in girls, which was basically the end of Boy Scouts. And Boy Scouts has had a problem anyway, there was a sexual assault scandal, abuse scandal, which was a real problem that it had never really dealt with very well,” Hegseth mentioned.

Advertisement

“That contributed to it as well. But ultimately, this was what you call a, what do they call it, “involuntary association” or “intermediate institution.” These are issues in Middle America, in between us and the federal government, like church buildings, like Boy Scouts, like youth teams, just like the Lions Club, which are actually the richness of the neighborhood. And a lot of them have misplaced what they stand for. And as a outcome, the federal government will get extra highly effective to fill the void. This is a tragedy. Young children received’t have the chance to be taught these abilities, however extra importantly, the values. And they did it to themselves,” Hegseth added.

Cain jumped in and issued a related opinion.

“Yeah, so, they’re dead. The Boy Scouts are dead. It no longer exists. It’s now just “scouting.” And it’s fairly, asymmetrical, I feel. You know, fast analysis reveals that Girl Scouts don’t enable boys. So if the Girl Scouts don’t enable the boys, however the Boy Scouts are in pursuit of inclusion, am I to be, the takeaway is that the Girl Scouts is just not a welcoming surroundings,” Cain mentioned.

“It’s maybe even bigoted because the Girl Scouts won’t let in boys. And maybe they’ll follow my path here and actually drop “girls” from the identify and so they’ll simply be scouts too. And they’ll be Scouting and Scouts, and also you received’t know which is which. And that’s sort of the aim in the long run. We received’t know which is which, as a result of we are able to’t differentiate between the Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts,” Cain added.

Cain concluded: “And maybe some Scout will come sell you cookies and you won’t know, “Hey, [are] these Girl Scout cookies?” I don’t know, we are able to’t name them Girl Scout cookies. They’re simply cookies. And it’s like, “Oh, we already have cookies. But I thought these were Girl Scout cookies?” And the whole lot simply turns into the identical, Ainsley: Blah, in pursuit of inclusion. It’s unhappy. It’s actually unhappy. It is the loss of life of the Boy Scouts. Hey, we do want areas. It’s not bigoted to say some areas are for boys, some areas are for ladies. We do want our areas.”

Advertisement

Test your abilities with this Quiz!



Source